Singapore take a 2-1 win over Thailand; fairly or not? This is what people are disputing over for now. I say, Singapore won fair and square. Simple. The referree makes the decision, he chooses whether to award the penalty. He DECIDED TO. So gei-kiang fans like NORMAN NG(spot The New Paper) can just shut the hell up. Do you even notice how ignorant you sounded or even looked(since its read, ha) by saying "The Thais did a smart thing in walking out" and going on to say they made a strong statement by walking off together. It is you who give murderers who can unaquitted the confidence in continuing the wrong doings. Face the fact brother. The Thais walked off because they did not want to lose the game so late. You say Singapore lacks in Sportsmanship and fair play, and I tell you you lack common sense and intellect. You say the stadium gave the Thai players a booing when they left the field, and it left you ashamed. ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY THEY DESERVE APPLAUSE? For spoiling a cup finals leg, for trying to overtake the referree s position, for being simply put, SORE LOSERS? You dont even know how utterly ridiculous you look. They should have added a profile picture of you since you want your opinion heard so much. (This fella actually sent three identical copies to different newspapers.) And then I shall boo you when I meet you in public. The Thais showed NO sportsmanship. And if you actually noticed, when the Thais walked on the field again, the SINGAPORE PLAYERS on pitch were CLAPPING, and ENCOURAGING THEM ON to play. You say Singapore lacks sportsmanship, IT WAS THE REF WHO GAVE THE PENALTY, not SINGAPORE.

It is unprofessionalism the Thais showed, not some act-righteous thing, like you think you re doing. And I believe you quit DOTA games because you are on the losing team. And you will actually miss court sessions if you are actually sued. Since you think such actions are SMART.

Bye loser.(This guy really got me frustrated)